Sexuality and Religious Court Authority: Interpreting Homosexuality in the Khulʿ Divorce Case in Singkawang, Indonesia
Article Sidebar
-
Religious Court, Homosexuality, Divorce Case, Khulʿ, Singkawang-Indonesia
Abstract
Homosexuality, defined as same-sex relationships among men, is not explicitly recognized as a legal ground for divorce under Indonesian marriage law. This study examines how judges interpret homosexuality in divorce proceedings, focusing on a khulʿ case filed by a wife in the Religious Court of Singkawang, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. The case exposes a normative gap between formal legal provisions and the socio-religious realities encountered by Muslim women seeking legal protection. Employing a socio-legal approach and qualitative content analysis of Decision No. 134/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Skw as primary data, the research explores judicial reasoning within the frameworks of discretion and interpretive practice that connect statutory law, Islamic legal principles, and social context. The findings reveal that the judges intentionally characterized homosexuality as “deviant behavior” constituting ongoing marital discord (shiqāq). This reasoning integrates juridical references to statutory law and judicial precedents, theological arguments derived from Sūrat al-Rūm verse 21, and several qawāʿid fiqhiyyah (Islamic legal maxims) emphasizing harm elimination, alongside moral and social considerations that underscore divorce as a means to prevent greater harm. This study advances a theoretical framework of interpretive strategies that bridge normative gaps and illuminate how Islamic family law is adjudicated within the evolving socio-legal landscape of contemporary nation-states.
Full text article
References
Abbasi, Muhammad Zubair. “Judicial Ijtihād as a Tool for Legal Reform: Extending Women’s Right to Divorce under Islamic Law in Pakistan.” Islamic Law and Society 24, no. 4 (2017): 384–411. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00244P04.
Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islamī wa Adillatuh. Vol. 7. Dār al-Fikr, 1989.
Azhar, SM Fahmi, Hardimansyah, and Indriastuti Ramadhani. “Reinterpreting Rāʿinā: A Maʿnā Cum Maghzā Approach to Surah al-Baqarah [2]:104 and Its Relevance for Contemporary Communication Ethics.” Basmala: Journal of Qur’an and Hadith 1, no. 1 (2025): 28–45. https://doi.org/10.24260/basmala.1.1.17.
Badri, Muhamad Arifin, Anas Burhanuddin, and Ghufran Jauhar. “Factors Influencing the Increase in Khulu’s Divorce: A Case at The Jember Religious Court (2021-2023).” Al-’Adalah 21, no. 1 (2024): 53–76. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v21i1.21074.
Baraḳ, Aharon. The Judge in a Democracy. Princeton Univ. Press, 2008.
Berman, Paul Schiff. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg and a Jurisprudence of Legal Pluralism.” George Washington Law Review 90, no. 6 (2022): 1427–57.
Bukido, Rosdalina, Nurul Azizah Azzochrah, Asril Amirul Zakariah, and Nur Paikah. “Divorce Among Female Muslim Civil Servants: Legal Perspectives in Indonesia.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 25, no. 1 (2025): 85–116. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i1.85-116.
Devy, Soraya, Amrullah Amrullah, and Utari Zulfiana. “Divorce Petition Against Drug User Husband: Case Study of Kuala Simpang Syar’iyah Court Decision, Aceh Tamiang.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, no. 2 (2023): 281–97. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i2.12062.
Faiz, Abd Karim, Zulfahmi Ar, and Ahmad Izzuddin. “Between State Law and Islamic Law: The Practice of Divorce Outside the Situbondo Religious Courts, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 2 (2022): 176–92. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v3i2.848.
Hakim, Muhammad Lutfi. “Between Hibah and Waṣiat Wājibah for Non-Muslims: Expansive Legal Interpretations by Indonesian Religious Judges in Inheritance Cases.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 17, no. 2 (2024): 147–66. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2024.17201.
Hakim, Muhammad Lutfi, and Khoiruddin Nasution. “Accommodating Non-Muslim Rights: Legal Arguments and Legal Principles in the Islamic Jurisprudence of the Indonesian Supreme Court in the Post-New Order Era.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 11, nos. 2–3 (2023): 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad004.
Haris, Ahmad, Edy Lisdiyono, and Setiyowati. “The Reconstruction of Religious Court Decision Execution on the Fulfilment of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce in Indonesia.” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 7 (2024): e5564. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-035.
Hayati, Mulida, and Nuraliah Ali. “Ex-Officio Rights in Talak Divorce: Study on Judges’ Considerations in the Compliance of Ex-Wife’s Rights.” Mazahib 21, no. 1 (2022): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i1.4219.
Idrus, Nurul Ilmi. “Marriage, Divorce and Reconciliation: State Law, Islam and Local Practice.” In Gender Relations in an Indonesian Society. Brill, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004311947_007.
Ikhwan, M., M. Agus Wahyudi, Sumardi Efendi, Randi Muhammad Gumilang, Afif Alfiyanto, and Reni Kumalasari. “Deciding To Be a Widow or Stay with A Husband: The Experience of Muslim Women Filing for Divorce in the Aceh Sharia Court.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 10, no. 1 (2025): 80–99. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v10i1.10825.
Izzuddin, Ahmad, Ahmad Rofiq, and Abu Hapsin. “Revitalizing Divorce Ethical Values in Verstek Decisions in Religious Courts/Revitalisasi Nilai Etika Perceraian dalam Putusan Verstek di Pengadilan Agama.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 13, no. 1 (2021): 80–96. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v13i1.12191.
Jones, Balawyn, and Amira Aftab. “Inside Indonesia’s Religious Courts: An Argument for Domestic and Family Violence Screening and Exemption from Compulsory Mediation.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 12, no. 2 (2023): 217–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad015.
Kholidah, Muhammad Ridho, Sobhan, and Mahyudin Ritonga. “Violation of Women’s Rights on Divorce: Study on Religious Court Decision.” Relacoes Internacionais No Mundo Atual 4, no. 42 (2023): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v4i42.6029.
LS Vs. ZO, 134/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Skw (Singkawang Islamic Court June 3, 2025).
Makinara, Ihdi Karim, Jamhuri Ungel, and Fitrah Arrazi. “Physical Handicap as a Reason for Divorce: Case Study at the Sharia Court, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, no. 2 (2023): 2. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i2.7836.
Masrukhin, and Meliana Damayanti. “Hukum Progresif Penanganan Hak Nafkah Anak dalam Kasus Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Karesidenan Surakarta).” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah dan Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v5i1.1794.
Maula, Bani Syarif, and Vivi Ariyanti. “Justice Negotiations for Women: Divorce Cases Due to Domestic Violence in Religious Courts.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 20, no. 1 (2022): 155–80. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v20i1.6024.
Muhammad Daud, Zakiul Fuady, and Raihanah Azahari. “The Wajibah Will: Alternative Wealth Transition for Individuals Who Are Prevented from Attaining Their Inheritance.” International Journal of Ethics and Systems 38, no. 1 (2019): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-09-2018-0133.
Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Islamic Law and Paradox of Domination and Resistance.” Asian Journal of Social Science 44, nos. 1–2 (2016): 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04401006.
Nawawi, M. Anwar, Sulastri Sulastri, Relit Nur Edi, and Agus Setiawan. “Harmonization of Islam and Human Rights: Judges’ Legal Arguments in Rejecting Child Marriage Dispensation in Sukadana, Indonesia.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 22, no. 1 (2022): 117–34. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.117-134.
Nelli, Jumni, Afrizal Mansur, Zulkifli Zulkifli, Maghfirah Maghfirah, Sofia Hardani, and Izzah Nur Aida. “The Immorality of a Husband as the Cause of a Working Wife to File for Divorce Lawsuit in Indonesia.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 22, no. 1 (2023): 119–32. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i1.7392.
Ningish, Putri Apria, Murniati Mukhlisin, and Jumni Nelli. “Family Financial Management in Realizing Sakinah Family.” In Wealth Management and Investment in Islamic Settings: Opportunities and Challenges, edited by Toseef Azid, Murniati Mukhlisin, and Othman Altwijry. Springer Nature, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3686-9_10.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. “Muslim Women in Indonesian Religious Courts.” Islamic Law and Society 20, no. 3 (2013): 242–71. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-0010A0003.
Nursaidah, Nursaidah, Adi Nur Rohman, and Panti Rahayu. “The Out of Court Divorce Model and Its Legal Implications: A Juridical Study in Babelan District Bekasi.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 20, no. 2 (2020): 159–74. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v20i2.3945.
O’Shaughnessy, Kate. “Divorce and Shame.” In Gender, State and Social Power in Contemporary Indonesia. Routledge, 2009.
Purna Nisa, Martina. “Critical Review of Domestic Violence as Reason for Divorce (Comparison of Divorce Laws in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Maldives).” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 16, no. 1 (2021): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i1.4292.
Putri, Ellis Lindini, Ari Azhari, Rahmat Abdullah, and Muhammad Husni. “Power Relations and Structural Inequality in Late-Life Divorce: A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Palembang Islamic Court Decisions in 2022.” Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Socio-Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2025): 25–46. https://doi.org/10.24260/ijssls.1.1.16.
Rinaldo, Rachel, Eva F. Nisa, and Nina Nurmila. “Divorce Narratives and Class Inequalities in Indonesia.” Journal of Family Issues 45, no. 5 (2024): 1195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231155657.
Sar’an, Mohamad, Yusuf Hidayatulloh, Sofia Gussevi, Riski Indrawan, and Nur Alam Ullumuddin Zuhri. “Implementation of Harmonious Family in the Concept of Proportionality of Obligations and Rights of Husband and Wife Relations: A Perspective on the Compilation of Islamic Law.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7, no. 2 (2024): 695–712. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.24662.
Sulistiani, Siska Lis. “Hukum Homoseksual Perspektif Maqashid Syari’ah.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (2019): 267–82. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v4i2.813.
“Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 3 of 2015 on the Implementation of the Formulations from the 2015 Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting as Guidelines for the Execution of Duties by the Courts.” December 29, 2015. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/sema-nomor-3-tahun-2015/detail.
Ulfiana, Ana, Indah Listyorini, and Muhamamd Yasir Majeed. “Judges’ Considerations in Divorce Cases Due to Broken Marriage: An Analysis of Contemporary Islamic Family Law.” Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 7, no. 1 (2025): 135–52. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art8.
Van Huis, Stijn Cornelis. “Khul‘ Over the Longue Durée: The Decline of Traditional Fiqh-Based Divorce Mechanisms in Indonesian Legal Practice.” Islamic Law and Society 26, nos. 1–2 (2019): 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00254A05.
Wardatun, Atun, and Bianca J. Smith. “Woman-Initiated Divorce and Feminist Fiqh in Indonesia: Narrating Male Acts of Nushūz in Marriage.” Ulumuna 24, no. 2 (2020): 266–95. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v24i2.416.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Rivany Anandya, Ardiansyah, Muhammad Lutfi Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Asy-Syir'ah : Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum by Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Article Details
