Community, Court, and Conciliation: Designing a Hybrid Mediation Model for Islamic Divorce Adjudication
Article Sidebar
-
Islamic Divorce, Hybrid Mediation, Hakam, Court–Community Relations, Legal Pluralism
Abstract
The appointment of a hakam, an individual who mediates disputes, in divorce proceedings constitutes a crucial mechanism for advancing justice and reconciliation within both Islamic law and the Indonesian judicial system. This study offers a comparative analysis of two predominant hakam models in Jember Regency: the formal-institutional approach utilized by the Religious Court and the communal-cultural approach practiced by community leaders or local religious figures (Kiai). Employing a qualitative case study methodology, the research draws on data collected through in-depth interviews with ten purposively selected participants, including judges, mediators, religious leaders, community elders, and divorced individuals, supplemented by direct observation and document analysis. The findings reveal that the formal-institutional model ensures legal certainty through standardized mediation procedures; however, it often overlooks the social and cultural dimensions of marital conflict. Conversely, the communal-cultural model emphasizes empathy, religious authority, and contextual harmony but lacks binding legal authority and enforceability. This study underscores the potential for synergy between formal legal mechanisms and socio-cultural practices. It contributes to the literature by proposing a hybrid hakam framework that integrates procedural justice with cultural responsiveness, demonstrating how the convergence of legal formalism and communal concern can enhance the effectiveness, fairness, and cultural relevance of Islamic divorce resolution in Indonesia.
Full text article
References
Ahyani, Hisam, and António José Pereira Figueiredo. “Integrating Shariah Principles in Modern Family and Economic Life for Social Well-Being and Justice.” Munakahat: Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 1 (2024): 94–107. https://ejournal.kampusalazhar.ac.id/index.php/jmk/article/view/25.
Amin, Nuzliyati, Abd Haris Abbas, Fatum Abubakar, and Asma Luthfi. “Revitalizing Religious-Based Mediation in Peripheral Indonesia: An Empirical Assessment of BP4’s Role in Family Conflict Resolution.” Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics 2, no. 1 (2025): 56–76. https://doi.org/10.63077/zaxhpt24.
Atiq, Emad H. “Legal Positivism and the Moral Origins of Legal Systems.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 36, no. 1 (2023): 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2022.17.
Bowen, John R. Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Englard, Izhak. “Law, Religion, and the Rule of Law from a Normative-Positivistic Perspective.” Journal of Law, Religion and State 5, no. 3 (2017): 175–84. https://brill.com/view/journals/jlrs/5/3/article-p175_175.xml.
Gilbert, Jeremie, Ilkhom Soliev, Anne Robertson, Saskia Vermeylen, Neil W. Williams, Robert C. Grabowski, and others. “Understanding the Rights of Nature: Working Together across and beyond Disciplines.” Human Ecology 51, no. 3 (2023): 363–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00420-1.
Griffiths, Anne. “Pursuing Legal Pluralism: The Power of Paradigms in a Global World.” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 43, no. 64 (2011): 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2011.10756674.
Haris, Ahmad, Edy Lisdiyono, and Setiyowati. “The Reconstruction of Religious Court Decision Execution on the Fulfilment of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce in Indonesia.” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 7 (2024): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-035.
Harrison, Russell S. “Community-Based Mediation Programs: A Case Study and Comparison.” International Journal of Public Administration 25, no. 11 (2002): 1427–57. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120013353.
Haryadi, Achmad Dodi, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih, and Arief Hidayat. “Consistency of Constitutional Court Decisions in Realizing Fair Legal Certainty.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Cultural Policy and Sustainable Development (ICPSD 2024), Springer Nature, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-315-3_32.
Hooker, Michael Barry. Indonesian Syariah: Defining a National School of Islamic Law. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008.
Ilazi, Ramadan, Bekim Çollaku, and Fisnik Rexhepi. Negotiating Peace in Kosovo: Local Perspective on European Union Mediation Efforts. Springer Nature, 2025.
Jones, Balawyn and Amira Aftab. “Inside Indonesia’s Religious Courts: An Argument for Domestic and Family Violence Screening and Exemption from Compulsory Mediation.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 12, no. 2 (2023): 217–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad015.
Khiar, Ardhi, and Farid Ahmad Abidin. “Influence of Religion on Resolving Social Conflicts: A Multi-Faceted Analysis.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora 13, no. 1 (2024): 53–64. https://journals.ristek.or.id/index.php/jiph/article/view/72.
Maxwell, Joseph A. “Designing a Qualitative Study.” In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Sage Publications, 2008.
Muhaimin. “The Interrelation between Islamic Law and Regional Regulations in Jember: Examining the Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah-Based Reasoning in Istinbāṭ Al-Aḥkām.” AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 20, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i2.18330.
Nafisah, Ratu Durotun, and Yassar Aulia. “Abusive Judicial Review and the Indonesian Presidential Age Limit Case.” Australian Journal of Asian Law 26, no. 2 (2025): 17–34. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5387995.
Nurdin, Abidin, Fajri M. Kasim, Muhammad Rizwan, Mahmuddin Daud. “The Implementation of Meunasah-Based Sharia in Aceh: A Social Capital and Islamic Law Perspective.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (2021): 760–79. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10710.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. Modernization, Tradition and Identity: The Kompilasi Hukum Islam and Legal Practice in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Amsterdam University Press, 2010.
Palombella, Gianluigi. “Interlegality and Justice.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066001.
Qamar, Azher Hameed, and Hafiza Faiza Faizan. “Reasons, Impact, and Post-Divorce Adjustment: Lived Experience of Divorced Women in Pakistan.” Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 62, no. 5 (2021): 349–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2021.1871840.
Rosen, Lawrence. The Justice of Islam: Comparative Perspectives on Islamic Law and Society. Oxford University Press, 2000.
Salman, Salman. “Implementation of Mediation and Hakam in Divorce Case in Religious Court.” International Journal of Nusantara Islam 8, no. 2 (2020): 274–81. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i2.12407.
Sholahudin, Umar, Hotman Siahaan, and Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman. “A Relational Analysis of State Law and Folk Law in the Bongkoran Agrarian Conflicts, Banyuwangi Regency, East Java, Indonesia.” Society 8, no. 2 (2020): 419–36. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v8i2.195.
Singeo, Klouldil. “(Re)Engaging Indigeneity in Planning: Epistemological Conflicts and Women’s Human Rights in Palau.” PhD Thesis, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/70417.
Thi, Tran Thi Minh. “Complex Transformation of Divorce in Vietnam under the Forces of Modernization and Individualism.” International Journal of Asian Studies 18, no. 2 (2021): 225–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479591421000024.
Tiara, Inoki Ulma, Bunyamin Maftuh, Elly Malihah, Didin Saripudin. “History of Conflict Resolution Education in Minangkabau.” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economic and Education (ICON 2021), European Alliance for Innovation, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-12-2021.2318302.
Twining, William Lawrence. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1490104.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Rohmad Agus Solihin, Imron Fauzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Asy-Syir'ah : Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum by Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Article Details
